Riding on
the bus this morning, taking full advantage of the free WiFi now available on
most public transport in Greater Manchester, I happened to glance at the time.
6:57am. What the heck, I wondered to
myself, I'll tune in to the Today Programme and catch the
so-called "headlines".
Top of the hour was the news of the Conservative Party's manifesto launch, coinciding with the official launch of Labour's election campaign (whatever official means - Jeremy Corbyn doesn't seem to have taken five minutes to himself since the date was announced). Attention was drawn (thanks to bullet-pointed press releases, I expect, more than to journalistic scrutiny) to the Conservative pledge to take action to "cap" energy bills; which, as reportedly explained in an article by Theresa May in today's Sun (can't wait to read that) would save "the average British household" £100 a year. God bless the BBC: our friends at Today hastened to add that similar pledges were to be made by Labour in due course. Discussion turned immediately to the tactical significance of this, to the idea of a Conservative proposal to intervene in the market (how very dare they?!) and the policy's resemblance to a Labour proposal in 2015 under"Red Ed" to do exactly that themselves. All very interesting. Just who should I vote for now?*
Top of the hour was the news of the Conservative Party's manifesto launch, coinciding with the official launch of Labour's election campaign (whatever official means - Jeremy Corbyn doesn't seem to have taken five minutes to himself since the date was announced). Attention was drawn (thanks to bullet-pointed press releases, I expect, more than to journalistic scrutiny) to the Conservative pledge to take action to "cap" energy bills; which, as reportedly explained in an article by Theresa May in today's Sun (can't wait to read that) would save "the average British household" £100 a year. God bless the BBC: our friends at Today hastened to add that similar pledges were to be made by Labour in due course. Discussion turned immediately to the tactical significance of this, to the idea of a Conservative proposal to intervene in the market (how very dare they?!) and the policy's resemblance to a Labour proposal in 2015 under"Red Ed" to do exactly that themselves. All very interesting. Just who should I vote for now?*
Let's not go here. Let's not go
down the road where the average Tory voter (probably?) spends £100 a day on
breakfast, while the average Labour voter (who?) spends £100 a year on food for
her 14 shoeless offspring (and that's if they're lucky). It's worth considering that for many an affluent middle
Englander (a who?) £100 is too petty a sum to even register as a
"saving", while for as many others in the working class (the what?)
that sort of money is the difference between destitution and, um, slightly less
destitution over the course of 52 weeks - but the narrative of
"class" politics and "traditional" party loyalties, still
so heavily implied in any public discussion of elections, while so lightly
associated with verifiable reality, really does not concern me here. Put
another way, I'm neither affluent nor working class, which I think makes me
"middle", which I thought we all were anyway; and which means
nothing, when it comes down to the shitty nitty gritty, really concerns me at all.
What concerns me is just how
tiredly one-dimensional this kind of spectacular politics is. Party A promises
to save you this much. Party B promises to save you that much. Who do you trust?
Nowhere to be found in discussion of
prospective government action to saving people money on their essential expenses is any consideration in saving
people consumption.
Where, for instance, are any initiatives that might bypass the issue of cost by
looking instead at the issue of use? How might governments exercise their power
to support a population not to save money doing what they do already, but to
save energy by changing what they do? How might a government
have a tangible effect on mitigating the effects of overconsumption by
encouraging us all to stop consuming so much? Whatever one's views on the
freedom or otherwise of "the market" (the what?) we tend not to ask
these questions, and neither do those with the power to answer them. Calling us
greedy, wasteful and generally detached from the imminent implications of potentially
catastrophic climate change (which we all are, and we all know it) does not win
votes. The prospect that we might have to change our lifestyles radically
if we are to hold such things as civil society and liberal democracy together
simply doesn’t cross the radar of mainstream political discourse. How could it?
Changing buses in
Manchester city centre, weaving my way through the sleeping bags that cocoon
the ever more prevalent rough sleepers not quite out of sight of the rest us, the happy
worker drones, I pass a man pulling himself up by the blanket he may well have
slept under, and which he’s hoisted to a piece of scaffolding, apparently
making a suicidal gesture to any pedestrian who dares (or cares) to look up
from their phone, and to his horrified girlfriend who screams "what yer doin? what
yer doin?!" hysterically until he climbs back down. Like every other passer-by, I do nothing to
intervene, relieved that action is apparently unnecessary. An appropriate metaphor, it occurs to
me. Of course, by the time this post is
published, he may have tried again, and succeeded this time. About which so much more could be said.
******
*As
a disclaimer, if that’s the right word: Please don’t interpret this post as
anti-political polemic of the “don’t vote, it only encourages them”
stripe. On June 8th, please
vote for whichever candidate in your area is best placed to beat the
Conservatives. Conservative governments
cause nothing but misery for people who most need the support of the state in a
liberal democracy. I will be voting Labour.
Comments
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome.